New Hampshire Taxpayers Still Face Crushing Government Pensions

View release as a PDF

Manchester—Taxpayers United of America (TUA) today released the results of a new pension study for the cities of Manchester, Concord, and Nashua; the counties of Merrimack and Hillsborough; and New Hampshire State government retirees.

“New Hampshire lawmakers have only flirted with reforms of the government pension system,” stated Jim Tobin, president of TUA. “New Hampshire has one of the lowest funded ratios in the country and reforms are still in the discussion stage.”

“While residents across New Hampshire face crushing tax increases, falling home values, rising unemployment, and a painfully slow economic recovery, government employees continue to receive stunning pensions largely funded by taxpayers who will never collect more than about $22,000 a year from Social Security.”

“New Hampshire is the 19th state in our nationwide pension reform tour and the results are consistent with our findings across the country: government pensions are out of control. Across the country, millions of bureaucrats are being paid billions, to do absolutely nothing!”

“The purpose of our study is to put some perspective around individual pensions, to put them in terms to which the average taxpayer can relate. Taxpayers need to know how much New Hampshire’s government retirees are being paid not to work and the astronomical accumulation of those payments over an average lifetime. Hundreds of government retirees’ pensions being released today will accumulate to millions of dollars in payouts.”

Tobin continued, “For example, Stephen Tierney, retired from the Manchester municipal government and collects an annual pension of $103,600. His estimated lifetime pension payout is a stunning $2,590,011.*”

Roger C. Brooks, retired from the Concord government schools, has an annual pension of $91,746, with a staggering estimated lifetime payout of $2,293,659.*

“Retired Nashua municipal government employee, Michael P. Buxton, has a lifetime estimated pension payout of $4,278,910*, with an annual pension of $109,716.”

View pension amounts below:

“New Hampshire’s government pensions are in serious trouble with no end in sight. Government employees should be paid a fair wage for the work they do today so they can save for their own retirement. Replacing defined benefit pensions for all new government hires with social security and 401(k)s would eventually eliminate unfunded government pensions. Current government employees must consider a voluntary pension contribution of up to 10% to preserve their pension benefits and the retirement age must be raised. Without such reforms, the system will collapse and pensions checks will simply stop coming,” added Tobin.

*Annual pensions are actual amounts provided by the respective fund. Lifetime estimates assume retirement at 60 for non-police and fire and retirement at 45 for police and fire. Uses a life expectancy of 85 (IRS Form 590).

9 Responses

  1. Scott T says:

    The New Hampshire taxpayer is getting ripped off! Wake up New Hampshire.

    • Concerned in Concord says:

      NH and other states can legally adjust the rates of the pensions. They should cap overall pension payouts to $65,000 for individuals. Some people are gaming the system by double collecting from a deceased spouse. But there shouldn’t be a penalty for marriage, thus individual and not a household cap.

      That alone would be a good first step. Privatizing has mixed success. It’s premised on good outcomes in the stock market and is legally questionable. I know as a recent college grad, I’ll get virtually nothing in government-backed retirement payments (SS or pension).

      An individual at retirement age has far less of a need for a bloated income than a young family of four buying a new home.

      And if we’re concerned about revenues, just legalize and tax recreational drugs. If someone kills themselves with it … that’s their choice. This is supposed to be the Live Free or Die state. Mass residents have more freedom on the marijuana question.

  2. Robert F. Libby says:

    I find the math used by the author of the article to be a bit skewed. He makes an assumption that the individual is receiving the amount quoted for the period of his computation to arrive at his seven figure amount. This is, however, not the case since most start out at a much lower number and it goes up thru cost of living increases. The COL have amounted to very little for the last several years in any case.
    The author also does not take into account that those of us who work in public safety do so for less money than much of the private sector, for longer hours, holidays and at greater danger. We do this because most feel a calling to public service, to protect and serve to quote the LAPD motto. We miss birthdays, Christmas with family and other important events that most people don’t. We see the worst that society has to offer, and on occasion give up our lives to protect others. The reward for this is the hope of making it to a decent retirement and a life more normal than the previous 20-25 years. Yet when we get there we have to listen to all those who would not want to do the job of police and fire, yet begrudge what we have earned and paid for. It is a sad testimony to what society has become.

    • admin says:

      There was no COLA (Cost of Living Adjustment) used in the calculation of the estimated lifetime payouts on this study. Government employees are paid more than private sector employees, 35 percent higher wages and nearly 69 percent greater benefits according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics. They also enjoy nearly ironclad job security.

    • Brent Arbogast says:

      If you are the same Robert F. Libby who prosecuted me for disturbing the peace while at Plymouth State, you are a poor public servant with little respect for the rule of law or due process. From my experience, you protect and serve yourself and your buddies in L.E. Remember when Chief John E. Clark attacked me on school property at Plymouth State College? It was all caught on video, but the video you turned over in discovery was edited to remove evidence incriminating the chief and exonerating me. You and/or Chief Clark tampered with witnesses as well, threatening PSC employees and students who planned on testifying in my favor. You played games with the procedural process, dragging out a simple town violation charge several months while working with Chief Clark, who was trying to get me kicked out of school based on the false charges. You purposefully mailed a motion for continuance to a non-existent address so I wouldn’t have a chance to object. You tried intimidating me by dismissing my motions as farcical and implying I could be punished somehow for filing them. Before the trial, as you kept demanding I plead guilty, even though I was innocent. At one point you asked if I ever heard the saying “you can’t fight City Hall”. I responded with another saying, “eternal vigilance is the price of liberty”. Thankfully, Judge Samaha saw through your charade and dismissed the case because you clearly violated my Constitutional rights. You actually threatened to appeal a town ordinance violation case!

      I was a senior Chemistry major taking many difficult advanced classes that year. I was trying to learn chemistry so I could help create medicines that save people’s lives. The prior year I had earned All-American honors in wrestling while representing PSC. I didn’t wrestle my senior year so I could focus on studying. You and Chief Clark made it very difficult for me to learn chemistry that year. Thank you for showing me how corrupt and petty leadership in the L.E. community can be.

  3. Chris says:

    While pension reform is needed everywhere, the boilerplate quote is just wrong.
    “While residents across New Hampshire face crushing tax increases,…”
    no- still no income tax or sales tax
    “…falling home values,…”
    no- home prices are up double digits off the financial crisis
    “…rising unemployment,…”
    no- NH has rising employment and the lowest unemployment in the northeast
    “…and a painfully slow economic recovery,…”
    yes- agreed

    One other point on the tax/home price issue, in most NH communities, the town and school budget is voted on by residents, so you are somewhat more in control of real estate taxes. When our valuation went down, so did our taxes.

    • admin says:

      New Hampshire home prices are down 3% from February 2011 to February 2012 and have fallen in both of the first two quarters of 2012. While NH enjoyed declining unemployment rates from June of 2009 to April of 2012, in more recent months, NH’s rate is climbing again and is now back to the Dec 2010 rate of 5.7%. New Hampshire has one of the worst pension systems in the country, in terms of unfunded liabilities. New Hampshire residents FACE crushing tax burdens if bureaucrats choose to tax their way out of this problem.

  4. Steve says:

    Robert Libbey was kind when he said the math was a bit skewed. You formulate your numbers based on an individual walking away at 45. While this may happen it often times does not. I think you will find people are more in the 50s age range when they leave. You also automaticlly use 85 at the other end for your figures. Again this is possible howeve it is not the rule. In fact I do not come across alot of 85 year old retired police and firemen.

    I realize you are obviously trying to raise the hysteria level but lets take a moment and do a little research.

    1. What did these individuals make when they took the job? If it was such a great deal how come more people did not hop on board?

    2. How many years of service did these members work? What is the average private sector pension for a job of comparable responsibility?

    3. What is the average pension of members in this system? What is the lowest 25 pension earners?

    I look forward to seeing your info.


    A concerned taxpaying NH resident.

    • admin says:

      Steve, The math is not skewed in any way. Safety officers are eligible to retire at 45 and the average life expectancy is 85. Safety officers have, according to CALPERS, the same life expectancy as non-safety officers. Why wouldn’t they? They can retire at 45, get premium healthcare and often get cost of living increases!

      Your questions are outside the scope of the study or information available regarding these retired individuals. Personal information is not released and information regarding employment is not stored in the retirement fund system. Average pensions are not relevant as they include part-time and not fully vested pensioners. What is relevant, is that government employees make higher wages than private sector employees and enjoy golden benefit packages not seen in any private sector jobs.

      The pension system is not sustainable. It is mathematically impossible to pay people NOT to work for more years than they are paid to work. For those that retire early, you could be paying three different people for the same single job at a given time.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *